I read the book a few years ago now, and went into the film adaption with an open mind. I really enjoyed the visual interpretation, with great acting and superb direction, it really became something more.
The reason I bring it up is I saw some similarities in how the tale was told in relation to my project.
A narrative is weaved in the film by the main protagonist, who is lost at sea following a shipwreck that leaves him stranded in a small boat with only animals for companionship, and even conflict.
As the tale is told, it becomes more and more fantastical, and by the end it is largely hinted at that the animals in the story were merely representations of actual individuals, that the places visited are actual metaphorical states of emotion, and that the reason for the story teller to change things, is that the adapted fantasy of the actual events was much more interesting and appealing to hear, than the tragic, often horrific truths that actually transpired. The story with the animals and added elements of make believe connected more with the viewer as opposed to the "plain" and "boring" version of actual events as told with real people.
In adapting the Train of Death issue for my own project, and retelling the story in my own way, I feel I can reflect the actual events but in a much more creative, interesting and appealing way, that will hopefully resonate more with my intended audience.
EDIT - When I mentioned the idea to a few people in our crit session meet-up, they agreed that using animals to reflect such a serious issue, might seem a little insensitive. I agree, it very easilly could. But I do feel that with the proper treatment and right tone, it will be fine. So I shall go to great lengths if need be to ensure that the tone is indeed right.
No comments:
Post a Comment